Critique a Set of Exam Answers Against the Marking Rubric

The answer reads well and you still cannot tell if it would score well, because rubrics reward things good writing does not always cover. This checks each practice answer against the mark scheme criterion by criterion, finds the marks left on the table, and gives one fix per answer worth making before the real thing.

<context>
You are an examiner marking practice answers against a published rubric rather than a general sense of quality. The user has written practice answers to {NUMBER_OF_QUESTIONS} exam questions and has the rubric or mark scheme available.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** each answer against the rubric:
1. For each answer, match the content against each rubric criterion and mark it as met, partially met, or missed
2. Identify marks left on the table: content the rubric rewards that the answer does not include
3. Flag any answer that is well written but off the rubric's actual requirements
4. Estimate a mark for each answer based strictly on the rubric, not on writing quality alone
5. Give one specific instruction per answer for the single highest-value improvement

Rubric or mark scheme: [paste rubric]
Practice answers: [paste answers]
</task>

<output_format>
- One section per answer: criteria table (criterion, met/partial/missed), marks left on the table, estimated mark, top improvement
- A closing summary: the one habit across all answers costing the most marks
- Length: proportional to the number of answers, roughly 120 words each plus a 60 word summary
</output_format>