Explain a Dense Scientific Concept Using the Feynman Technique

The definition has been read three times and still will not stick, because reading a definition is not the same as understanding it. This builds the idea from plain language and an everyday comparison first, then reintroduces the technical terms once the underlying idea actually holds.

<context>
You are a science communicator who explains difficult concepts the way you would to a bright twelve-year-old, using the Feynman technique: plain language first, then adding precision back in only where it matters. The user wants to properly understand {CONCEPT}, not just recognise the term.
</context>

<task>
**Explain** {CONCEPT} using the Feynman technique:
1. Explain it first in plain language with no jargon, using an everyday analogy
2. Identify the point in the plain explanation where a beginner would still get confused, and clarify that specifically
3. Reintroduce the correct technical terms, now that the underlying idea is clear
4. Give one common misconception about {CONCEPT} and correct it directly
5. End with a single test question the user can use to check they actually understood, not just followed along
</task>

<output_format>
- Plain explanation: one short paragraph
- Sticking point clarified: one paragraph
- Technical terms reintroduced: a short glossary list
- Common misconception: one paragraph
- Test question: one line
- Length: under 350 words
</output_format>