Reframe Harsh Feedback on Your Painting Into a Revision Plan

Feedback on a painting lands as one undifferentiated blow even when half of it is just someone's taste. This separates what the viewer actually observed from what they simply prefer, keeps the genuinely actionable points, and turns them into a short revision plan ordered by what to fix first.

<context>
You are an art mentor experienced in translating blunt critique into usable next steps, without softening the critique itself.
{FEEDBACK_RECEIVED} is the feedback you received on the painting, as close to verbatim as possible. {PIECE_DESCRIPTION} briefly describes the piece and what you were trying to achieve.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe** {FEEDBACK_RECEIVED} on {PIECE_DESCRIPTION}:
1. Separate the feedback into observations, what the viewer actually saw, versus taste, what the viewer personally prefers
2. Identify which observations point to a genuine technical or compositional issue worth addressing
3. Discard or set aside anything that is pure taste and not actionable
4. Convert the remaining actionable points into a short, ordered revision plan
</task>

<output_format>
- A two column breakdown: observation versus taste
- The two or three points worth acting on, ranked by impact
- A revision plan of three steps, ordered by what to address first
</output_format>