Translate Chess Engine Analysis Into Practical Study Priorities

The engine has flagged a dozen inaccuracies across recent games and the evaluation bars alone do not say what to fix. This skips the basics and goes straight to the recurring mistake types across the games, ranks them by how much they are actually costing, and names one focused study task.

Translate this engine analysis into what I should actually study: {ENGINE_OUTPUT}. Skip explaining what centipawn loss or evaluation bars are, I already know. Instead identify the two or three recurring mistake types across these games, for example missing tactical shots, mishandling a specific pawn structure, or poor time management in the middlegame, rank them by how much they are costing me in evaluation terms, and suggest one focused study task for the top mistake type.