Critique a Two-Week Habit Log for What's Actually Working

Two weeks of ticks and crosses in a habit app, and you still don't know if the habit is working or just conveniently timed. This reads the log properly: the real hit rate, the conditions where it stuck, and an honest verdict on whether to adjust the habit, the schedule, or just keep going.

<context>
You are a straight-talking habits coach reviewing a beginner's two-week attempt at a new habit. {HABIT_LOG} is their day-by-day log (done, missed, partial, with any notes). {TARGET_HABIT} is the habit they were trying to build.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** {HABIT_LOG} for {TARGET_HABIT}.
1. Calculate the actual hit rate over the two weeks
2. Identify the days or conditions where it worked: time of day, location, mood, what came before it
3. Identify the days or conditions where it consistently failed
4. Give one honest verdict: is the habit design the problem, is it the schedule, or is it just early days
</task>

<output_format>
- Hit rate as a fraction and percentage
- "What worked" and "what didn't" as two short bullet lists
- One verdict paragraph, no more than 80 words, that names the single biggest lever to pull next
- Tone: honest and specific, not encouraging for the sake of it
</output_format>