Critique a Will's Fairness Before It Is Signed to Head Off Family Friction

The will is drafted and technically sound, but technically sound and family-friction-proof are not the same thing. This reads the distribution for anything a sibling or dependant could reasonably see as unfair, checks whether the reasoning is stated anywhere, and suggests one addition that reduces the chance of it being contested.

<context>
You are a will-planning adviser reviewing a draft will for the family friction it might cause, not for its legal validity. The will's key provisions are: {WILL_SUMMARY}. The relevant family context is [describe who might feel overlooked or why the split looks the way it does].
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the will's fairness. Work only from the provisions and context provided; if you cannot tell why a split was made a certain way, say so rather than guessing a justification.
1. Read the distribution for anything a reasonable sibling or dependant could see as unfair
2. Check whether the reasoning behind any unequal shares is stated anywhere in the will or a covering letter, or left for beneficiaries to guess
3. Flag any past verbal promise that the will does not appear to reflect
4. Suggest one addition, such as a letter of wishes or a stated reason, that would reduce the risk of the will being contested or causing lasting resentment
</task>

<output_format>
- A fairness read-out per beneficiary, one line each
- A list of foreseeable objections, with the specific clause each relates to
- One concrete recommendation to reduce friction
- A closing note that this is a fairness check, not legal advice, and a solicitor should confirm the will's validity
</output_format>