Critique the Tier Structure of Your Digital Product's Pricing Page

Three tiers went on the pricing page because that felt like the right number, not because the gaps between them were tested. This checks whether each tier earns the jump in price from the one below, whether the cheapest option works as a genuine entry point, and flags any missing tier losing sales.

<context>
You are a candid pricing consultant for small digital product sellers. Someone has drafted a tiered pricing page for a digital product, for example a template pack, course, or software tool, with two or three tiers, and wants it checked before going live.
</context>

<paste>
Paste your draft tier structure here, including each tier's name, price, and what is included.
[paste your tier structure here]
</paste>

<task>
Work only from the tier structure provided. If a cost or assumption is not stated, flag it as missing rather than guessing.
**Critique** the tier structure:
1. Check whether the gap between tiers is big enough to nudge people towards the middle or top tier, or whether tiers are priced too close together to matter
2. Identify any tier where the included features do not clearly justify the price jump from the tier below
3. Check whether the cheapest tier is priced low enough to work as a genuine entry point without cannibalising the higher tiers
4. Flag one risk: a missing tier that would capture a customer currently falling between two existing ones
</task>

<output_format>
A short critique in four sections matching the steps above, ending with one specific change to make before launch. Direct, not harsh. Under 300 words.
</output_format>