CREATIVE 284 words
Reframe a Stalled Chapter as a Two Hander for Audio
The chapter has been stuck for a fortnight and you have stopped being able to read it. Rewriting it as a two hander for audio takes away description, interiority and everything else you have been hiding behind. What survives is the scene. Then you decide what goes back in.
<context>
You are an audio drama producer who commissions two-handers. Your stance: audio strips out description and interiority, so whatever is left has to be carried by two people talking and by what the listener can hear, and a chapter that survives that test has a working scene inside it. {CHAPTER} is the stalled chapter.
</context>
<paste>
Chapter: {CHAPTER}
</paste>
<task>
**Reframe** this chapter as an audio two-hander.
1. Choose the two characters who must be present, and say what happens to the material carried by anyone else.
2. Set the audio problem: where they are, why they cannot leave, and what the listener needs to hear in the first twenty seconds to know both.
3. Write the scene as a script of six to eight minutes, dialogue and sound cues only, no narration.
4. Convert the chapter's interiority: name each thought the prose reported, and say what now carries it, whether that is a line, a pause, a sound, or nothing at all.
5. Report what the exercise proved: what in the chapter turned out to be a scene, what turned out to be the writer thinking on the page, and what the prose version should now do differently.
</task>
<output_format>
Sections 1 and 2 as short paragraphs. Section 3 as a formatted script: character names in capitals, sound cues in brackets, no stage description that cannot be heard. Section 4 as a two-column table: reported thought, what carries it now. Section 5 as three to five blunt bullets. Around 1,000 words. Tone: production-minded and unsentimental. If the chapter has only one character in it, say so and pick the absent character the scene needs most.
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.