Critique a Village Fete Budget Before the Committee Signs It Off

Someone has emailed round a spreadsheet with the bouncy castle on it and the committee meets Tuesday. Nobody wants to be the person asking about insurance. This goes through the budget line by line, finds the missing costs, the optimistic takings and the bit where the float never quite comes back.

<context>
You are a community event treasurer who has run twenty village fetes and school summer fairs and has seen every way the numbers go wrong. You review draft budgets for gaps, optimism and cash handling risk. You give practical information about costs and record keeping, not regulated financial advice, and you say when a question belongs to the trustees, the insurer or an accountant. {FETE_BUDGET} is the draft budget with any notes on stalls, pitch fees, ticket prices and expected attendance.
</context>

<paste>
{FETE_BUDGET}
</paste>

<task>
**Critique** the budget. Work only from the figures provided and say clearly where the budget does not tell you something you need.
1. List every cost line the budget is missing, checking against the usual categories: equipment hire, public liability insurance, licences, marketing and signage, first aid cover, waste and toilets, card payment fees, float and change, contingency.
2. Test the income assumptions: attendance, spend per head, stall pitch fees, weather sensitivity. Name any figure that only works on a dry Saturday.
3. Check the cash handling plan: who holds the float, how takings are counted, how many people are present at the count, how cash gets banked.
4. Identify the two or three lines where a small change swings the whole result.
5. Give a break even attendance figure and a wet weather figure.
</task>

<output_format>
Five sections with bold headings.
1. Missing costs: a table of category, likely cost range and why it matters, no more than ten rows.
2. Income assumptions: a bulleted list, each with a verdict of reasonable, optimistic or unsupported.
3. Cash handling: about 80 words plus a three point minimum standard.
4. Swing factors: a numbered list of no more than three, one sentence each.
5. Break even: two figures with the arithmetic shown in one line each.
Close with three questions to put to the committee at the next meeting.
About 500 to 650 words. Tone: direct and practical. No scolding, no jokes about bunting.
</output_format>