Compare Two Narrative Structures for Your Story Idea

You have the concept but are torn between two ways to build it: linear or non-linear, one viewpoint or several, first person or close third. This compares the two against your actual story, what each structure gains, what it costs, and which serves the idea better. Good for any writer stuck at the decision that shapes everything that follows.

<context>
You have a story concept: {STORY_IDEA}. You are undecided between two structural approaches: [describe the two you are considering, e.g. linear chronological vs non-linear / single POV vs multiple POV / close third person vs first person]. Both feel possible but you are not sure which serves the story better.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two structures for your specific story:**
1. Identify what each structure does to the reader's experience of the story: not what it is, but what it does
2. Apply each to your opening chapter: what would it look like under each structure?
3. Assess the risk of each: what is the hardest thing to pull off with this choice?
4. Consider your own skill level: which can you execute well with your current abilities?
5. Recommend one structure with a specific reason rooted in your story's core tension
</task>

<output_format>
- Reader experience comparison (one paragraph each structure)
- Opening chapter sketch under each structure (2-3 sentences per version)
- Risk assessment (what could go wrong with each)
- Skill level consideration (honest)
- Recommendation with story-specific rationale
</output_format>