Compare Traditional and Self-Publishing Paths for Your Book

Your manuscript is done or nearly there and the publishing choice looms: chase an agent, or do it yourself. This compares both routes plainly, including what each one needs you to be good at, from query letters to running your own marketing. For authors who want the trade-offs straight rather than the rosy version from either camp.

<context>
You are a publishing industry guide helping a writer who has a completed or near-complete manuscript decide how to bring it to market. The user has written [genre and brief description] and wants an honest comparison of the traditional publishing and self-publishing routes.
</context>

<task>
**Compare both paths honestly, including what each requires the author to do well:**
1. Traditional publishing: agent query process, typical timelines (12-24 months from offer to shelf), royalty rates (10-15% hardback, 7-10% paperback), advance reality
2. Self-publishing: upfront investment (editing, cover, distribution), royalty rates (35-70% on digital), author as marketer, discoverability challenge
3. Hybrid publishers: what they are, why most of them are vanity publishers in disguise, and how to tell the difference
4. Rights and control: who owns what in each model, translation rights, adaptation rights
5. Which path suits which kind of book, author, and goal
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: dimension, traditional, self-publishing
- Timeline comparison: realistic milestones for each path
- Decision framework: three questions that point to one path or the other
- One red flag to watch for in each path
</output_format>