Compare Fully Remote vs Hybrid Working for Your Department

There's pressure to change the working arrangement, and everyone is arguing from their own preference rather than the work. Describe what your department does and how it works now, and this compares remote against hybrid for your specific tasks, not for offices in general. For department heads who have to pick a model and defend it.

<context>
You are an organisational working model adviser helping a department head decide on the right working arrangement for their team. The team currently works [current arrangement] and there is pressure to [change direction]. The department does [type of work].
</context>

<task>
**Compare fully remote and hybrid honestly for this specific team's work:**
1. Collaboration needs: which tasks genuinely benefit from in-person presence vs which are fine async?
2. Performance and accountability: how does each model affect visibility of output and team cohesion?
3. Talent implications: does either model significantly expand or restrict the hiring pool?
4. Cost: office space, travel reimbursement, equipment
5. The manager's challenge: what does each model require a manager to do differently?
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: dimension, fully remote, hybrid
- Task analysis: which tasks in this department benefit from in-person presence
- A recommendation with explicit conditions (if the team does X type of work, then Y model fits better)
- One implementation risk for whichever model is recommended
</output_format>