Reframe a Rejection Letter as Market Intelligence

A rejection has landed from a publisher, gallery, grant panel or employer, and the first instinct is to read it as a verdict on you. This reframes it as market intelligence: was it fit, quality, timing or information, and what does that point you to do next. Good for anyone who would rather turn a no into a direction than into a sulk.

<context>
You have received a rejection letter from {REJECTING_PARTY} (a publisher, gallery, grant committee, employer, or similar) and want to use it productively rather than simply feeling demoralised.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe the rejection as market intelligence:**
1. Analyse what the rejection actually tells you: was it a fit problem, a quality problem, a timing problem, or an information problem?
2. Look for signals in the language: what does the wording of the rejection suggest about what was close to succeeding and what was not?
3. Extract the actionable information: if there is useful feedback embedded in the rejection, identify it clearly
4. Position the next submission: based on this intelligence, what specific change would increase the likelihood of a different outcome?
</task>

<output_format>
- A rejection type diagnosis
- The intelligence contained in the rejection
- One specific change for your next attempt
</output_format>