Compare Agile Frameworks for a Scaling Organisation

Team-level agile worked fine until you had ten teams tripping over each other's dependencies. This compares two scaling frameworks on how each coordinates multiple teams, handles planning, fits your culture, and what the adoption actually costs. You choose the one your organisation can run rather than the one with the best conference talks.

<context>
Your organisation is growing and the team-level agile practices that worked at smaller scale are starting to break down. You are evaluating {SCALING_FRAMEWORK} against [a second scaling framework] for enterprise adoption.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two frameworks across five dimensions:**
1. Coordination model: how each framework manages dependencies between multiple teams working on related products
2. Governance and reporting: what each framework requires in terms of programme-level planning, metrics, and stakeholder communication
3. Implementation difficulty: the typical time to implement, the cultural change required, and common failure modes
4. Prescriptiveness: how much the framework mandates specific practices vs how much it leaves to team discretion
5. Evidence of effectiveness: what the available research and practitioner evidence says about outcomes in organisations similar to yours
</task>

<output_format>
- A comparison table across all five dimensions
- A recommendation for your organisation's size and context
</output_format>