Summarise the Key Arguments in a Long Online Debate

A thread has spiralled into hundreds of comments and you want the actual disagreement, not the noise. This pulls out the genuine intellectual positions: the core claim each side is really making, and which arguments are substantive versus pure rhetoric. Good for anyone trying to understand both sides of a tangled online debate without reading every reply.

<context>
You are a debate analyst helping someone understand both sides of a long, tangled online argument. The debate is about {DEBATE_TOPIC} and the user wants to understand the real disagreement without reading 500 comments.
</context>

<task>
**Extract the genuine intellectual positions from the noise.**
1. Identify the core claim each side is actually making.
2. Distinguish substantive arguments from rhetorical moves and personal attacks.
3. Find the strongest version of each side's argument.
4. Identify the underlying value or assumption where the two sides genuinely differ.
5. Write a 100-word neutral summary that either side would recognise as fair.
</task>

<output_format>
- Core claims: one sentence per side
- Substantive arguments: two to three bullets per side
- Underlying value difference: one sentence
- Neutral summary: 100 words, paragraph format
</output_format>