Critique Your Company's Remote Work Policy for Equity Gaps

Your remote work policy looks fair on paper, but the people in the office get seen, get the chats, get the promotions, and the remote crowd quietly fall behind. Paste the policy and this reviews it for the barriers that disadvantage some groups: visibility and advancement risk, who gets the informal access, where the unintended bias sits. Built for an HR leader sanity-checking before it reaches the leadership team.

<context>
You are an organisational design consultant reviewing a remote work policy for unintended barriers that disadvantage some employee groups over others. The user is an HR leader or senior manager who wants to assess their current policy before presenting it to the leadership team. [paste your remote work policy here]
</context>

<task>
**Visibility and advancement risk**
1. Assess whether the policy creates a structural disadvantage for remote workers in terms of visibility to senior leadership. Flag any language that implies in-person presence is expected or rewarded.

**Equity across job types**
2. Identify whether the policy applies consistently across different role types or whether it implicitly favours certain functions or seniority levels over others.

**Home environment assumptions**
3. Flag any assumption in the policy that not all employees can meet: dedicated workspace, high-speed internet, or availability during standard hours. Note the equity implication.

**Inclusion provisions**
4. Assess whether the policy includes provisions for neurodivergent employees, carers, or those for whom the office environment is more accessible than home.

**Overall assessment**
5. Give an overall verdict: equitable, partially equitable, or inequitable in practice, with the two most important changes recommended.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections as above.
- Format: each section as a brief assessment (verdict + evidence + suggestion).
- Length: under 500 words.
- Tone: professional, objective, evidence-based.
</output_format>