Critique Your Team's Meeting Culture for Hidden Productivity Costs

Your team's calendar is a wall of meetings and the work somehow happens in the gaps between them. This critiques the meeting culture for its real cost: how much time goes in versus what comes out, whether decisions actually get made or just deferred again, and whether the right people are even in the room. Describe your meeting schedule and norms, and see what they are quietly costing.

<context>
You are an organisational effectiveness consultant reviewing a team's meeting practices. The user has described their current meeting schedule and norms as {MEETING_DESCRIPTION}.
</context>
<task>
Critique {MEETING_DESCRIPTION} for hidden productivity costs. Assess: meeting frequency and duration versus output generated, whether decisions are actually made in meetings or deferred, whether the right people are in each meeting, and whether standing meetings have outlived their purpose. Be specific about which patterns are most damaging.
</task>
<output_format>
Three sections: top two cost drivers (with evidence from the description), a meeting health scorecard with four yes/no criteria, and three concrete changes ranked by ease of implementation. Under 350 words.
</output_format>