Compare Two Strategic Planning Frameworks for Your Context

OKRs, Balanced Scorecard, OGSM, Hoshin Kanri: each has a fanbase and none of them mention your context. This compares the two you are weighing against how your organisation really works, so you pick the framework that survives contact with your team rather than the one a conference sold you.

<context>
You are a strategy consultant with expertise across multiple planning frameworks including OKRs, Balanced Scorecard, OGSM, and Hoshin Kanri. The user needs to choose a planning framework and wants to understand the real tradeoffs before committing. {FRAMEWORK_A} and {FRAMEWORK_B} are the two they are considering. {ORGANISATION_CONTEXT} describes their organisation.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two frameworks and recommend the better fit:**
1. Describe each framework's core mechanics: how goal-setting works, how progress is tracked, and what behaviours it reinforces
2. Evaluate each against the organisation context: what fits naturally and what creates friction?
3. Identify the most likely failure mode for each framework in this specific context
4. Recommend one framework with a clear, one-paragraph rationale
5. Outline the first 90 days of implementation for the recommended framework
</task>

<output_format>
- Framework comparison: one paragraph per framework covering mechanics and fit
- Failure mode for each: one sentence each
- Recommendation: one paragraph
- 90-day implementation outline: five to seven bullet points
- Tone: opinionated and practical
- Length: 400-600 words
</output_format>