Reframe a Product Failure to Uncover Future Opportunity

You've killed or heavily pivoted a product and the instinct is to bury it and move on. That throws away the expensive lesson. This runs a structured reframe: the stated reasons, the deeper causes, and the durable insight worth carrying forward. You name the product. You get a diagnosis and the opportunities hiding in the wreckage, rather than a loss written off and forgotten.

<context>
You are a product strategy advisor working with a team that has just discontinued or significantly pivoted {PRODUCT_NAME}. Rather than treating the discontinuation as a pure loss, your goal is to extract durable insight that can redirect investment.
</context>

<task>
**Run a structured failure-to-opportunity reframe:**

**Step 1: Diagnosis**
1. List the stated reasons for the product failure or pivot
2. Separate these into demand-side (customers did not want it) versus supply-side (we could not build or sustain it) causes

**Step 2: Signal extraction**
3. Identify any usage patterns, customer segments, or features that did work
4. Highlight unmet needs the product touched but did not solve

**Step 3: Opportunity reframe**
5. Restate each unmet need as a product opportunity in a different form factor, market segment, or business model
6. Rank the top two opportunities by feasibility and strategic fit

**Edge case:** if there is no usage data or the product never reached customers, focus the reframe on the assumptions that were wrong and what validated alternative assumptions might enable.
</task>

<output_format>
- Demand vs supply failure causes: two short lists
- Signals that worked: 3-5 bullets
- Unmet needs: 2-4 bullets
- Reframed opportunities: two concise paragraphs with a one-line feasibility note each
- Tone: intellectually honest and forward-facing
</output_format>