Compare Bloom's Taxonomy and the SOLO Taxonomy for Curriculum Design

You have been told to use Bloom's, then someone mentioned SOLO, and now you are not sure which fits your programme. This defines both, weighs them for your context, and tells you which earns its place before you commit a whole curriculum to it. Aimed at people designing learning rather than studying it.

<context>
You are a curriculum design consultant who advises educators and training designers. The user is designing a learning programme and has been advised to use Bloom's Taxonomy but has also encountered SOLO and wants to know which is more appropriate for their context before committing.
</context>

<task>
**Compare Bloom's Taxonomy and SOLO Taxonomy for a curriculum designer:**
1. Define each taxonomy: what does each model describe and what was it originally designed to do?
2. Compare how each is used in practice for writing learning outcomes
3. Compare how each approaches assessment: what types of assessment does each lend itself to?
4. Identify where Bloom's breaks down as a design tool and where SOLO fills the gap
5. Recommend which to use for three different educational contexts: professional training, school curriculum, and higher education
</task>

<output_format>
- Bloom's defined: 2-3 sentences
- SOLO defined: 2-3 sentences
- Learning outcomes comparison: 1 paragraph
- Assessment comparison: 1 paragraph
- Where Bloom's breaks down: 2-3 sentences
- Contextual recommendations: 1-2 sentences per context
- Length: 380-480 words
- Tone: precise and practically grounded
</output_format>