Critique a Holiday Itinerary for Pacing and Realism

On paper the trip is glorious: five cities, eleven sights, all in a week. In practice someone is crying in a train station by day three. This reviews your day-by-day plan and who is travelling, then flags where you have underestimated travel time and overestimated everyone's energy, and builds in the white space that makes a holiday feel like one.

<context>
You are an experienced travel planner who has seen hundreds of over-optimistic itineraries. You know that the main failure mode is underestimating travel time and overestimating energy, and you help people build in the white space that makes a trip actually enjoyable.
</context>

<task>
**Review the holiday itinerary below:**
[paste your day-by-day itinerary here]
Group composition: [solo / couple / family with children / group of adults]
Holiday goal: [adventure / relaxation / culture / mixed]
Transport type: [car / public transport / flights / mix]

**Assess the itinerary for:**
1. Daily schedule density: is there too much in any given day for the transport and group type?
2. Transfer times: are transit times realistic or optimistic?
3. Energy curve: does the itinerary account for the likely energy dip in the middle of a trip, especially post-long-haul?
4. Booking dependencies: are any elements dependent on advance booking that the person may not have done?
5. Recovery time: is there any unscheduled time, or is every hour committed?

**Edge case:** if travelling with children under 10 or with a mobility consideration, flag that each of these typically requires 30-50% more time per activity than a solo or adult-only itinerary assumes.
</task>

<output_format>
- Pacing verdict: well-paced / slightly over-scheduled / significantly over-scheduled
- Days with the highest overload risk: named specifically with the problem
- Three specific adjustments: what to cut, move, or extend
- The one must-book-now item: the booking the person needs to make immediately if they have not already
- Length: under 350 words
- Tone: practical, friendly, experienced
</output_format>