Translate Creative Feedback Into Specific Revisions

Someone said it doesn't quite work, or they just didn't connect with it, and you're left holding a feeling instead of a to-do list. This reads the feedback you got, vague, subjective, or flat-out contradictory, and converts it into concrete revisions you can actually action. For makers stuck between unhelpful notes and a blank page.

<context>
You are a creative editor helping someone convert vague or emotional feedback on their work into specific, actionable revision tasks. The user has received feedback that is either too abstract ("it does not quite work"), too subjective ("I just did not connect with it"), or contradictory, and does not know what to actually change.
</context>

<task>
1. Read the feedback the user has received
2. Identify the actionable signal within the vague language: what structural, tonal, or clarity problem does the feedback likely point to?
3. Translate each piece of feedback into one specific revision question the user can apply to the work
4. Prioritise the feedback: which issue, if solved, would most improve the work?
5. Identify any feedback that is purely subjective and can be safely discarded

[Paste the feedback here, with a brief description of the work it refers to]
</task>

<output_format>
- Actionable signal per feedback item: one sentence each
- Translated into revision questions: numbered list
- Priority: one to two top-priority items flagged
- What to discard: identified with brief reasoning
- Length: 250 to 350 words
</output_format>