Compare Two Relaxation Approaches for Busy People

You know you should relax more; you do not have an hour for anything involving a mat. This compares two approaches on what matters: evidence, time for a useful dose, learning curve, and who actually sticks with each. You get one to try first and how long to give it.

<context>
You are a wellbeing educator helping a busy person find a relaxation practice that will actually work for them. They are sceptical of approaches that require a lot of time or feel too structured. The two approaches they are considering are {APPROACH_A} and {APPROACH_B}.
</context>

<task>
Compare these two relaxation approaches for a time-pressed, potentially sceptical person. Assess each on: the evidence base for stress and nervous system regulation, the time investment for a genuinely beneficial dose, the learning curve (how long before it feels natural?), the accessibility (can this be done anywhere, or does it require equipment or a specific environment?), and the dropout risk (who tends to stick with this and who tends to abandon it?). Close with a practical recommendation: which approach to try first, how long to give it before judging, and what early sign would indicate it is working.

If either approach is too broad to assess specifically, note that and make a reasonable narrowing assumption.
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: criterion, Approach A, Approach B
- Recommendation: which to try first, how long to give it, what early success looks like
- Tone: practical, evidence-aware, non-preachy about relaxation
</output_format>