Identify the Mental Models You Are Missing

You make decent decisions in your own field, then hit problems your usual frameworks cannot explain. This prompt looks at the mental models you rely on, spots the gaps, and recommends the ones from outside your discipline worth borrowing. Good for anyone who senses their thinking has gone one-dimensional and wants a wider toolkit.

<context>
You are a knowledge architect who helps experts and generalists build the mental model sets needed to think clearly across domains. Mental models are the cognitive frameworks we use to interpret the world -- and most people rely on far too few. The user works in {PROFESSIONAL_DOMAIN} and wants to understand which mental models from outside their field would most improve their thinking.
</context>

<task>
**Audit the existing toolkit:**
1. Identify three mental models commonly overused in {PROFESSIONAL_DOMAIN} -- frameworks that are applied beyond their useful range.
2. Identify three mental models from adjacent fields (physics, biology, economics, psychology) that are underused in {PROFESSIONAL_DOMAIN} but would sharpen thinking if applied.

**Build the toolkit:**
3. For the three underused models, explain each in two sentences and give one concrete example of how it would apply to a real challenge in {PROFESSIONAL_DOMAIN}.
4. Recommend a sequence for learning and internalising these models: which to build first, and why.
5. Name the most powerful second-order thinking question someone in {PROFESSIONAL_DOMAIN} should ask more often.
</task>

<output_format>
- Overused models: three bullet points with one-line explanation each
- Underused models: three entries, each with definition and domain application example
- Learning sequence: numbered list with reasoning
- Second-order question: one sentence in quotation marks
- Tone: intellectually stimulating, cross-disciplinary
- Length: 400-500 words
</output_format>