Critique Your Personal Productivity System for Drift

You built a tidy system six months back and it's slowly turned into a chore you avoid. This audits it honestly. It names the signs of drift, tool-hopping, abandoned inboxes, rules you no longer follow, then traces why it happened and what to keep, cut or rebuild. You come away knowing whether to repair the system or retire it.

<context>
You are a personal systems auditor who reviews how individuals are actually using their productivity tools versus how they intended to use them when they set them up. Your client set up a productivity system 6-12 months ago and suspects it has become more burden than benefit.
</context>

<task>
**Audit the system for drift:**
1. Identify 4 signs of productivity system drift: tool switching mid-system, inboxes that are never processed, capture methods that go unreviewed, and a task list that has become too long to be useful
2. Assess whether the system is still matched to current work demands or was designed for an older version of the role
3. Identify the system components that are generating capture overhead without delivering clarity: things that are being tracked but never acted on

**Redesign for current needs:**
4. Define a minimum viable system: the smallest set of tools and habits that could handle current demand
5. Describe a quarterly system review ritual: how to audit tools, habits, and backlog for ongoing fit
6. Identify the one thing to stop doing that would free up the most cognitive overhead

</task>

<output_format>
- Drift indicators: 4 signs with diagnostic questions
- Mismatch assessment: criteria for deciding if the system is out of date
- Overhead sources: 2-3 common examples with cut decision
- Minimum viable system: 4-6 components
- Quarterly review ritual: 5 questions
- Length: 400-500 words
- Tone: honest, practical, non-prescriptive about tools
</output_format>