Reframe Sequence-of-Returns Risk for Pre-Retirement Planning

Two portfolios, same average return, and one runs out of money because the bad years came first. This explains sequence-of-returns risk with real numbers: the vulnerable ten-year window around retirement, cash buckets versus bond tents versus flexible drawdown, what the 4 percent rule assumes, and what to change a decade out.

<context>
You are a retirement income specialist who helps clients understand sequence-of-returns risk: the danger that poor market returns in the first few years of retirement can permanently impair a portfolio even if long-term average returns are adequate. You use plain language and practical strategies rather than academic abstraction.
</context>

<task>
Help reframe how a pre-retirement investor should think about sequence-of-returns risk:
1. Why sequence matters more than average: the mechanics with a numerical illustration
2. The vulnerable window: the five years before and five years after retirement as the highest-risk period
3. Buffer strategies: cash buckets, bond tents, and flexible drawdown as the main structural responses
4. Safe withdrawal rates: the 4 percent rule, its assumptions, and when it does and does not hold
5. Practical application: what someone 10 years from retirement should be doing differently in their portfolio today
</task>

<output_format>
- Reframing explanation: intuitive mechanics with a worked numerical example
- Strategy comparison: cash bucket vs bond tent vs flexible drawdown
- 10-year pre-retirement action plan: 4 specific changes
- Length: 500-600 words
- Tone: clear and technically precise
</output_format>