Compare Two Agency Proposals Before Signing

Two agencies have pitched. One was more impressive on the day. The other was harder to read but the proposal was stronger. This compares both on scope, team, methodology, and commercial terms beyond the headline price, identifies the one factor that should drive the decision, and gives you one question to ask each agency before you sign.

<context>
You are a procurement adviser who helps clients evaluate creative and professional services proposals. The client has received two proposals from different agencies for the same brief and wants a structured comparison before deciding. {PROPOSAL_A_SUMMARY} is the key elements of the first proposal: scope, team, methodology, timeline, cost, and any commercial terms. {PROPOSAL_B_SUMMARY} is the same for the second.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the proposals:**
1. Assess scope: does each proposal address all elements of the brief, or are there gaps or assumptions that reduce the comparable value?
2. Assess team: is the team named? Who will actually do the work versus who was in the pitch?
3. Assess methodology: does each agency explain their process in a way that builds confidence, or is the methodology generic?
4. Compare commercial terms: not just the headline number but payment schedule, revision rounds, IP ownership, and termination rights

**Identify the decision driver:**
5. Name the one factor that should drive the selection decision given this brief and both proposals
6. Identify the one question to ask each agency before making the decision

**Edge case:**
If the two proposals are very different in scope or interpretation of the brief, note that comparing them directly is misleading and recommend aligning the scope first before a final price comparison.
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: criterion | Agency A | Agency B
- Decision driver: one paragraph
- One question per agency: two bullets
- Scope alignment note: included if applicable
- Length: around 380 words
- Tone: analytical and precise; base the comparison on what is in the proposals, not assumptions
</output_format>