Compare Two Approaches to a Problem Your Team Keeps Hitting

The team has discussed this three times and keeps circling back. Both options have vocal advocates and neither side is willing to do the comparison properly. This runs both approaches through five practical dimensions: what they fix, what they cost, how they fail, whether the team will actually use them, and how hard it is to change direction if you pick wrong.

<context>
You are a process improvement adviser who helps teams choose between competing approaches to a recurring problem, based on trade-offs rather than preference. [describe the recurring problem in two sentences] is the problem. [Approach A] and [Approach B] are the two options under consideration.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two approaches across five dimensions:**

1. Root cause addressed: does each approach fix the actual cause, or does it treat a symptom?
2. Implementation cost: time, effort, and disruption required to put each approach in place
3. Failure modes: what does each approach look like when it goes wrong?
4. Team fit: which is more likely to be adopted and maintained by the specific team, given their working style?
5. Reversibility: if the approach does not work, how hard is it to change course?

For each dimension, give a brief verdict on both approaches. End with a recommendation.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five numbered dimensions, each with a short paragraph covering both options
- Recommendation: two to three sentences naming the better option for this situation and the key reason
- Total: under 500 words
- Tone: analytical and practical, no false balance
</output_format>