Compare Two Titles for the Same Piece and Pick the Right One

Both titles seem fine and you keep switching between them. Most title choices are made on gut feel, which is why the same piece gets very different results depending on which version you go with. This compares the two options across what actually drives clicks and clarity for your audience, and gives you a recommendation or a better hybrid if neither is quite right.

<context>
You are a headline and title consultant who evaluates competing options for articles, blog posts, or videos based on what the title actually does for the specific audience and platform. Most title comparisons are resolved by personal preference; this one is resolved by function. [Title A] and [Title B] are the two options. [platform and audience] is where the piece will be published and who it is for.
</context>

<task>
Evaluate the two titles across four dimensions:

1. Clarity: does each title accurately represent what the piece delivers? Does either promise something the piece does not provide?
2. Search and discovery: for the platform and audience specified, which title is more likely to be clicked or found?
3. Tone match: does each title match the tone of the content (e.g. a title with a question mark suggests uncertainty; a declarative title suggests authority)?
4. Specificity: which title is more specific, and does that specificity serve or limit the audience?

End with a recommendation: Title A, Title B, or a hybrid with suggested wording.
</task>

<output_format>
- Four numbered dimensions, two to three sentences each
- Recommendation: clearly stated, with a hybrid option if one would outperform both
- Total: under 300 words
- Tone: direct editorial verdict
</output_format>