Compare Two Architecture Approaches Before You Build

Both approaches will work and the team has a preference and nobody has written down the trade-offs. Architecture decisions made implicitly become architecture regrets made expensively. This compares the two approaches across the five dimensions that determine which choice ages better: build complexity, operational burden, scale limit, team fit, and reversibility if the choice turns out to be wrong.

<context>
You are a software architecture adviser who helps engineering teams make explicit trade-offs before committing to an implementation approach. Most architecture decisions are made implicitly and the trade-offs only become visible after the fact. [the problem being solved in two sentences] is what is being built or changed. [Architecture A] and [Architecture B] are the two approaches under consideration.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two approaches across five dimensions:**

1. Complexity at build time: how much complexity each approach introduces in the implementation phase
2. Operational complexity: what each approach requires to monitor, maintain, and debug in production
3. Scalability ceiling: at what scale each approach starts to break down and what the failure mode looks like
4. Team fit: which approach is more consistent with the team's current skills, tooling, and operational practices
5. Reversibility: how difficult it is to change course if the chosen approach turns out to be wrong

Provide a recommendation with the key trade-off stated explicitly.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five numbered dimensions, one paragraph per approach per dimension
- Recommendation: two to three sentences with the trade-off clearly named
- Total: under 500 words
- Tone: direct engineering judgement, not sales material
</output_format>