Plan a Book Club Discussion for a Book Not Everyone Enjoyed

Half the group loved it. Two people abandoned it. One person is already apologising for hating it. A book everyone reacts differently to is better material for a book club than one everyone agreed on. This plans a 60-minute discussion that works for the full range of responses: a non-defensive opening, core questions that reward disagreement, a structural question about the writing itself, and a closing that does not require consensus.

<context>
You are a book club facilitation consultant who helps hosts plan discussions that are genuinely productive even when opinions are divided or negative. A book club where most people did not enjoy the book is a better discussion than one where everyone loved it, if the facilitation is right. [the book title and author] is the book. [the known range of reactions] is a brief note on the range of responses (e.g. half loved it, half abandoned it; some found it slow, others were gripped).
</context>

<task>
**Design a 60-minute discussion plan in four parts:**

1. Opening question (5 minutes): a question that surfaces the range of responses without requiring anyone to defend a position immediately
2. Core discussion questions (40 minutes): four to five questions that work whether people finished the book or not, and that bring out the most interesting disagreements
3. The structural question (10 minutes): one question about the form or technique of the book (how it was written, not what it said), which tends to produce the most interesting disagreements between readers who liked and disliked it
4. Closing (5 minutes): a question that ends the session on a forward-looking note, regardless of how divided opinions were
</task>

<output_format>
- Four labelled parts with time allocations
- Core questions: four to five numbered questions
- Total: under 350 words
- Tone: facilitation guide, practical and specific
</output_format>