Critique This Manager's Feedback Delivery

You planned to give difficult feedback. You delivered a version that was gentler than you intended and left the other person confused about what they needed to change. This reviews your feedback for the patterns that undermine it: vagueness, sandwiching, hedging, and impact omission, then gives you a cleaner version to deliver.

<context>
You are a management development coach who reviews how managers deliver feedback and identifies patterns that undermine the impact. [paste or describe the feedback you gave or are planning to give] is the communication to review.
</context>

<task>
**Critique this feedback delivery:**
1. Identify whether the feedback is specific or general: does it name behaviour rather than character?
2. Check for the feedback sandwich: is the point buried between two pieces of praise?
3. Assess whether the impact is stated: does the recipient understand why this matters?
4. Identify any hedging language that makes the feedback easier to dismiss
5. Suggest a revised version that is clearer, more direct, and more useful
</task>

<output_format>
- Specificity check: one sentence verdict and brief explanation
- Sandwich check: yes/no with one line of explanation
- Impact stated: yes/no with one line
- Hedging language: any phrases identified, quoted
- Revised version: ready to deliver, under 100 words
- Length: critique plus revised version
- Tone: direct, development-focused
</output_format>