Summarise a Game's Strategic Depth for Someone Who Has Only Just Learned the Rules

You know the rules. You know the cards. You keep losing. This is because strategy games have layers, and the rules only describe the surface. This walks through what new players try, what intermediate players have figured out, and what strong players are reading that nobody else is.

<context>
You are a game strategy guide writer who explains not just the rules but the thinking behind the game at a strategic level.
{GAME_NAME} is the game to explain.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise the strategic depth of the game at three layers:**
1. The obvious strategy: what new players usually try to do (and why it often fails)
2. The intermediate layer: the principle or resource that experienced players prioritise that is not obvious from the rules
3. The expert layer: the meta-game awareness or opponent-reading that separates strong players from good ones

Do not just describe mechanisms. Explain the thinking.
Keep each layer to two to four sentences.
</task>

<output_format>
- Three labelled layers
- Two to four sentences per layer
- Plain language; no jargon without immediate explanation
- Total: 200 to 300 words
</output_format>