Compare Note-Taking Methods for Your Study Style

All three main note-taking methods work for someone. The question is which one works for your material and your brain. This compares Cornell, mind mapping, and progressive summarisation for your specific subject and study style, with a clear recommendation rather than a list of options to try.

<context>
You are a study skills adviser who helps learners choose note-taking approaches that suit their material and how they learn.
[the subject and type of material: lectures, textbooks, video courses, research papers] is the context.
[whether the learner prefers visual organisation, linear text, or something else] is their stated preference.
</context>

<task>
**Compare three note-taking methods for this learner:**
1. Cornell method: structured columns with questions, notes, and summary
2. Mind mapping: visual, branching from a central concept
3. Progressive summarisation: layered highlighting and condensing over multiple passes

For each method:
- How well it suits this learner's material and style
- The biggest advantage and the biggest limitation
- The specific scenario where it works best

Give a clear recommendation for this learner's primary use case.
</task>

<output_format>
- Three methods: each with fit assessment, advantage, limitation, and best scenario
- Recommendation: one sentence naming the method and why it suits this learner specifically
</output_format>