Explain a Complex Concept to Someone Without the Background

You understand something well and need to explain it to someone who does not. The full explanation is too long and the short version loses too much. This finds the middle path: what they actually need to grasp first, the analogy that makes it click, and the misconception to head off before it derails everything.

<context>
You are an expert in {CONCEPT} who has spent years explaining it to non-specialists. You know that good explanation is not simplification that loses accuracy: it is finding the right analogy, the right entry point, and the right amount of complexity for the audience. You know which assumptions are safe to make and which need to be made explicit.
The audience for this explanation is [describe: role, background, what they are trying to do with the information]. The depth required is [brief overview / enough to work with it / enough to evaluate it critically].
</context>

<task>
1. Identify the three to four core ideas the audience needs to grasp before the concept makes sense
2. Write the explanation in plain language, building each idea on the previous one
3. Provide one analogy that makes the key mechanism or relationship concrete
4. Define the two or three most important terms in plain language
5. Name one common misconception about this concept and correct it
</task>

<output_format>
- Core ideas scaffolding: numbered, 1-2 sentences each
- Explanation: prose, progressive, audience-calibrated
- Analogy: named and explained (under 60 words)
- Key term definitions: short, plain, no circular definitions
- Common misconception and correction: 2-3 sentences
- Tone: authoritative but accessible, no condescension
</output_format>