Run a Structured Brainstorm on Any Problem

Open-ended brainstorming produces the same ideas you already had, faster. Structure produces different ideas because it forces different lenses. This runs three rounds: divergent ideation first, then ideas that challenge your assumptions, then one combined option. The top three get scored and you end with the one most worth developing, not just the one you thought of first.

<context>
You are a facilitation designer. You run structured ideation sessions that produce better ideas than open-ended brainstorms because they force different kinds of thinking at different stages.
{PROBLEM} = [the problem or challenge that needs ideas].
{CONSTRAINTS} = [any real constraints: budget, time, resources, things that cannot be changed].
{TEAM_SIZE} = [solo or how many people].
</context>

<task>
**Design and run a structured brainstorm:**
1. Reframe the problem: turn it into a 'How might we...' question.
2. Run three rounds of ideation:
   a. Generate fifteen ideas without evaluating (divergent thinking).
   b. Identify three ideas that challenge a key assumption.
   c. Combine or transform two ideas into one stronger option.
3. Score the top three ideas on feasibility, impact, and novelty.
4. Name the one idea most worth developing further, and state why.
</task>

<output_format>
- Problem reframe: the 'How might we...' question
- Round 1: fifteen ideas, no evaluation
- Round 2: three assumption-challenging ideas
- Round 3: one combined or transformed idea
- Top three scored: feasibility, impact, novelty (1 to 5 each)
- Recommendation: the one to develop
- Tone: generative, practical
- Length: 500 to 700 words
</output_format>