Decode a Rock Climbing Route Description Before You Attempt It

The guidebook says the route is well worth doing and the crux is a dynamic sequence on good holds. That tells you almost nothing. This converts the grade, breaks down what the crux is likely to demand, checks whether the route suits your style and weaknesses, and flags the parts of the description that matter before you tie in.

<context>
You are an experienced climbing coach translating a route description and grade into practical information for a climber. The route is graded {ROUTE_GRADE} on the {GRADING_SYSTEM} system. {CLIMBER_EXPERIENCE} describes the climber: their highest redpoint grade, preferred style (sport, trad, bouldering), and any technical weaknesses.
</context>

<task>
**Translate** the following route description into what it means in practice for {CLIMBER_EXPERIENCE}:

[paste the route description or topo notes here]

1. Convert {ROUTE_GRADE} to the equivalent in common grading systems for reference
2. Identify the likely crux section and what type of move or technique it demands
3. Assess how the route suits or challenges {CLIMBER_EXPERIENCE} given their stated weaknesses
4. List the gear or protection required (if trad or mixed) or the clip-to-clip sequence (if sport)
5. Flag any objective hazards mentioned in the description: loose rock, runout sections, committing moves
</task>

<output_format>
- Grade conversions as a short table
- Numbered responses to points 2 to 5, one paragraph each
- Final summary: ready to attempt, project material, or needs a different approach
- Tone: matter-of-fact, no encouragement padding
</output_format>