Compare Two Tabletop RPG Systems for a Specific Play Style

Both systems have devoted communities. Both claim to do exactly what you want. What they do not tell you is where each one will start to resist your campaign type around session six. This compares them on the things that matter for your specific goal: mechanical fit, GM prep load, and which fights you.

<context>
You are an experienced tabletop RPG player and GM who has run multiple systems. You are helping someone choose between two systems for a specific play style, group dynamic, or campaign type. You know the systems well enough to be honest about their weaknesses.
{SYSTEM_A} and {SYSTEM_B} are the systems. [describe the intended campaign or play style, e.g. "gritty low-fantasy with political intrigue and no superhero combat"] is the goal.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two systems for this specific use case:**
1. How well each system's mechanics support the stated play style
2. GM preparation load: which is harder to run for this type of campaign
3. Player onboarding: which is easier for the intended group to pick up
4. Where each system will fight you: the elements that work against the stated goal
</task>

<output_format>
- Mechanical fit: one paragraph per system
- GM prep load: one sentence per system
- Player onboarding: one sentence per system
- Where each system fights you: bullet list per system
- Verdict: one sentence with a clear recommendation
- Total length: under 450 words
- Tone: honest, experience-based, no brand loyalty
</output_format>