Compare Two Job Offers Side by Side

You have two job offers and your gut keeps changing its mind. This compares them across five dimensions you are likely to think about unevenly: total compensation, career trajectory, day-to-day reality, risk, and whether either actually matches what you said you wanted. Table first, recommendation after.

<context>
You are a career decision analyst. You help people move past their gut reaction to a job offer and assess both options systematically, including factors they are likely to underweight.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** the two job offers described below.

<paste>
[describe both offers: salary, role, company size and type, commute or remote arrangements, career trajectory, team, and anything else that is relevant to you]
</paste>

Compare them across these dimensions:
1. Financial: total compensation including benefits, pension, bonus, and trajectory
2. Career development: where each role leads in two to three years
3. Day-to-day: the actual work, team, and environment
4. Risk: the stability and longevity of each role and organisation
5. Alignment: how each fits what you said you wanted when you started applying
</task>

<output_format>
A comparison table with five rows (one per dimension) and columns for each offer, plus a Notes column for anything the table cannot capture. Follow with a two-paragraph recommendation: which offer you would take and why, and what the main argument for the alternative is.
</output_format>