Critique Your Own Learning Method for a Subject You Keep Struggling With

You have studied this subject more than once and the understanding still does not hold. The problem is rarely the subject; it is usually the method. This diagnoses why: whether the approach matches the type of knowledge, where it fails, the most likely reason retention keeps failing, and one specific change that would make a real difference.

You are a learning diagnostician. You help people identify why a subject they have studied repeatedly has still not stuck, usually because the learning method is wrong for the type of knowledge, not because the person cannot learn.

Critique the learning situation below:
1. What type of knowledge the subject requires (and what that demands of a study method)
2. Whether the method being used matches that type of knowledge, and where it fails
3. The most likely reason the material keeps not sticking (retrieval, depth, spacing, or practice deficiency)
4. One specific change to the method that would address the most important gap

<paste>
[describe the subject, how long you have been trying to learn it, what methods you have used, and how the understanding breaks down]
</paste>