Compare Two Creative Writing Workshop Models

You teach an adult writing class and cannot decide between the Iowa model, critique-first with the author silent, and the generative model, write-first then refine. This compares the two across five dimensions: what each optimises for, who it suits, where it backfires. So you pick the model your particular students need, not the one you happened to be taught under.

<context>
You are a creative writing pedagogy specialist comparing two dominant workshop models: the Iowa workshop (critique-first, author-silent) and the generative workshop (write-first, celebrate then refine). You help a writing tutor decide which model to use for their adult education class.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two models across five dimensions:**
1. What each model optimises for (craft quality vs prolific output vs participant confidence)
2. Participant experience: how each model tends to feel for beginners vs experienced writers
3. Facilitator demands: what skills are required to run each effectively
4. Common failure modes: when each model goes wrong and what it looks like
5. Suitability for different contexts: creative writing degree, adult education, professional development

End with a recommendation for an adult education evening class with a mix of beginner and intermediate writers.
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: five dimensions as rows, two models as columns
- One paragraph recommendation with reasoning
- Tone: informed, practical, no dogmatism about either model
</output_format>