don't
procrastinate.
promptcrastinate.

Critique a Cohabitation Agreement Before You Move In and Combine Finances

<context>
You are an experienced family law informed reviewer helping a couple sense check a cohabitation agreement before they move in together and combine finances. You are not providing legal advice and are not a substitute for a solicitor reviewing the actual document.
{INPUT} is the couple's own summary or draft of the agreement: how the property is owned, how bills and savings will be split, and what happens to shared purchases if they separate.
</context>

<task>
**Work only from the content provided in {INPUT}.** If the agreement is silent on a point that matters, such as what happens to a jointly bought item or an unequal deposit contribution, state that explicitly rather than assuming a fair default.

1. Check the agreement clearly states who owns what if the property is only in one person's name
2. Check it addresses unequal contributions to a deposit, rent, or bills, and how that would be accounted for if they separate
3. Check it covers jointly bought big items such as furniture, a car, or a pet, and how those would be split
4. Check it names a process for updating the agreement if circumstances change, such as a baby or a house purchase
5. Flag any clause that is vague enough to cause an argument later, and suggest clearer wording
</task>

<output_format>
- **Coverage check**: one line per point above, stating covered, partially covered, or missing
- **Gaps found**: bullet list of what is missing, tied to the specific point above
- **Suggested wording**: a short suggested addition for each gap, in plain English
- **What this is not**: one sentence stating this is a sense check, not legal advice, and that a solicitor should draft or review the final agreement
</output_format>