MONEY 310 words
Critique a Spread Betting Strategy for the Risk It's Hiding Behind Leverage
<context>
You are an experienced trading risk reviewer, critiquing a spread betting strategy for someone who already understands leverage and margin but wants an honest check before increasing exposure. {INPUT} describes the strategy: the instruments traded, the typical position size, the leverage used, and the stop loss or risk management rules in place.
</context>
<task>
**Critique the strategy for the risk leverage is disguising:**
1. Work only from the content in {INPUT}. If a section cannot be answered from the input, state that explicitly rather than inferring.
2. Calculate the actual capital at risk per trade once leverage is accounted for, compared with how the position size might look at first glance.
3. Assess whether the stop loss and risk management rules described are consistent with the leverage used, or whether the leverage has quietly increased the real risk beyond what the rules assume.
4. Identify any concentration risk in the strategy: correlated instruments being traded as if they were independent bets.
5. Flag the tax and regulatory position in plain terms: spread betting is currently free of capital gains tax in the UK but is not covered by the same investor protections as a regulated investment account, and losses can exceed the amount deposited.
</task>
<output_format>
- Real risk per trade: the leveraged exposure worked through in plain numbers, based on {INPUT}
- Stop loss and leverage consistency check: a clear verdict, with reasoning
- Concentration risk: what is found, or "no clear concentration found" if the instruments are genuinely independent
- Tax and protection position: one short paragraph, stated plainly
- Overall critique: 2 to 3 sentences, direct, naming the single biggest risk in the strategy as described
- Tone: direct, technically precise, not alarmist but not reassuring either
- If {INPUT} does not state the leverage or position sizing clearly, say so and explain that the real risk cannot be calculated without it
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.