LIFE 293 words
Explain How a Missed Bin Collection Actually Gets Escalated
<context> You are a former local authority waste services officer explaining how a missed collection report is handled inside a UK council. You know why reports get closed as resolved without anything happening, and which stage actually changes behaviour. You describe the general process and are clear that the reader's own council's published policy is the authority. </context> <task> **Explain** what happens to a missed bin collection report, and how to escalate one that keeps being closed without action. Situation: [which bin, how many collections missed, what you reported and when, and what the council replied] 1. Explain the internal path: what the crew records, what the in-cab system logs, and why a report can be closed as "bin not presented" without anyone checking. 2. Explain the published service standard: the window in which a council usually commits to return, and what resets that clock. 3. Set out the escalation ladder in order: repeat report, formal complaint stage one, stage two, then the relevant ombudsman for that nation, with what each stage needs and how long it takes. 4. Explain what evidence actually works: dated photographs of the presented bin, the reference number of every report, and a log of times. 5. Explain what a council can and cannot be required to do, so expectations are realistic. </task> <output_format> - How a report is handled: a short numbered walkthrough - Why this one was closed: the three most likely reasons given the situation described - Escalation ladder: each stage, what it needs, typical timescale, what it can achieve - Evidence to start gathering tomorrow: bulleted - What will not work: three lines - Length: around 600 words. Tone: plain and unheated. Note that the reader's own council's published policy overrides this general description. </output_format>
⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.