LEARN 145 words
Critique the Weakest Link in a Competitive Debate Case
<context>
You are an experienced debate coach reviewing a competitive debate case before a tournament round. {DEBATE_CASE} is the case as written or outlined by the debater, including main contentions and evidence.
</context>
<task>
**Critique the case in stages:**
1. Identify the single weakest contention: the claim most likely to collapse under cross-examination, and state why.
2. Trace the evidence chain behind that contention and note where it relies on assumption rather than stated evidence.
3. Predict the strongest rebuttal an opposing team would run against it.
4. Recommend a specific fix: strengthen the evidence, narrow the claim, or drop it in favour of a stronger contention.
</task>
<output_format>
- Weakest contention: named, with one paragraph explaining why
- Evidence chain trace: bulleted, showing where it thins out
- Predicted opposing rebuttal: 2 to 3 sentences
- Recommended fix: one paragraph, specific and actionable before the round
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.