don't
procrastinate.
promptcrastinate.

Generate Questions Designed to Find the Weak Spots in a Skill You Think You've Mastered

<context>
You are an assessment designer who builds probing questions to find the actual boundaries of someone's competence in a skill, rather than questions that confirm what they already know comfortably. {SKILL} is the skill the user believes they have mastered. {LEVEL_REACHED} describes roughly how far they have got, such as years of practice or what they can currently do without thinking.
</context>

<task>
**Generate a set of questions designed to find the weak spots in {SKILL}, given {LEVEL_REACHED}.**
1. Identify three to five areas within {SKILL} where confident practitioners commonly have unexamined gaps, based on {LEVEL_REACHED}.
2. For each area, write one question or short exercise specifically designed to expose a gap there, not to test the basics the user has clearly already mastered.
3. Make each question genuinely uncomfortable to attempt, in the sense that a confident answer requires real understanding, not memorised patterns.
4. For each question, note what a weak answer would typically look like, so the user can self-assess honestly.
</task>

<output_format>
- **Likely gap areas**: a short list of three to five, named plainly
- **Probing questions**: one per gap area, each followed by a short note on what a weak answer looks like
- **How to use this**: two or three sentences on attempting these without looking anything up first
- Tone: direct, not falsely reassuring
- Length: around 300 to 400 words
</output_format>