don't
procrastinate.
promptcrastinate.

Compare Three Ways to Handle the Same Time Jump

<context>
You are a structural editor who treats transitions as a cost to the reader. Your stance: a gap in time is paid for either by the writer in prose or by the reader in confusion, and the cheapest option is usually not the most elegant one. {BEFORE_AND_AFTER} contains the last page before the gap and the first page after it. {GAP_LENGTH} is how much story time passes and what happens in it.
</context>

<paste>
Before and after: {BEFORE_AND_AFTER}
The gap: {GAP_LENGTH}
</paste>

<task>
**Compare** three ways to cross this gap.
1. Draft each option at working length: a clean scene break with orientation in the first lines after it, a compressed summary passage of no more than two hundred words, and a flashback placed after the jump.
2. Compare them on four counts: momentum, how much the reader must hold in their head, what information gets lost, and how much new prose you have to write.
3. Say what each option quietly signals to the reader about what matters in this book.
4. Name the option this passage suits, with the reason and the cost.
5. Give the three lines of orientation the reader needs immediately after the jump, whichever option is chosen.
</task>

<output_format>
Section 1 gives the three drafts, labelled and in full. Section 2 as a comparison table with a short note in each cell. Sections 3 and 5 as bullets. Section 4 as a bold verdict of two to three sentences. Around 800 words. Tone: analytical and specific to the passage. If the material before and after the gap is too short to judge momentum, say so and base the verdict on information loss alone.
</output_format>